Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Bench Marking strategies for business process improvement

Lecture-6
Bench Marking & strategies for business process improvement


Definition
Benchmarking is the process of identifying "best practice" in relation to both products (including) and the processes by which those products are created and delivered. The search for "best practice" can taker place both inside a particular industry, and also in other industries (for example - are there lessons to be learned from other industries?).
The objective of benchmarking is to understand and evaluate the current position of a business or organization in relation to "best practice" and to identify areas and means of performance improvement.
The Benchmarking Process
Benchmarking involves looking outward (outside a particular business, organization, industry, region or country) to examine how others achieve their performance levels and to understand the processes they use. In this way benchmarking helps explain the processes behind excellent performance. When the lessons learnt from a benchmarking exercise are applied appropriately, they facilitate improved performance in critical functions within an organization or in key areas of the business environment.
Application of benchmarking involves four key steps:
(1) Understand in detail existing business processes
(2) Analyze the business processes of others
(3) Compare own business performance with that of others analyzed
(4) Implement the steps necessary to close the performance gap
Benchmarking should not be considered a one-off exercise. To be effective, it must become an ongoing, integral part of an ongoing improvement process with the goal of keeping abreast of ever-improving best practice.
Types of Benchmarking
There are a number of different types of benchmarking, as summarized below:

Most Appropriate for the Following Purposes
Strategic Benchmarking
Where businesses need to improve overall performance by examining the long-term strategies and general approaches that have enabled high-performers to succeed. It involves considering high level aspects such as core competencies, developing new products and services and improving capabilities for dealing with changes in the external environment. Changes resulting from this type of benchmarking may be difficult to implement and take a long time to materialise
Most Appropriate for the Purposes of- Re-aligning business strategies that have become inappropriate.
Performance or Competitive Benchmarking
Businesses consider their position in relation to performance characteristics of key products and services. Benchmarking partners are drawn from the same sector. This type of analysis is often undertaken through trade associations or third parties to protect confidentiality.
Most Appropriate for the Purposes -Assessing relative level of performance in key areas or activities in comparison with others in the same sector and finding ways of closing gaps in performance.
Process Benchmarking
Focuses on improving specific critical processes and operations. Benchmarking partners are sought from best practice organizations that perform similar work or deliver similar services. Process benchmarking invariably involves producing process maps to facilitate comparison and analysis. This type of benchmarking often results in short term benefits.
Most Appropriate for the Following Purposes- Achieving improvements in key processes to obtain quick benefits
Functional Benchmarking
Businesses look to benchmark with partners drawn from different business sectors or areas of activity to find ways of improving similar functions or work processes. This sort of benchmarking can lead to innovation and dramatic improvements.
Most Appropriate for the Following Purposes- Improving activities or services for which counterparts do not exist.
Internal Benchmarking
Involves benchmarking businesses or operations from within the same organization (e.g. business units in different countries). The main advantages of internal benchmarking are that access to sensitive data and information is easier; standardized data is often readily available; and, usually less time and resources are needed. There may be fewer barriers to implementation as practices may be relatively easy to transfer across the same organization. However, real innovation may be lacking and best in class performance is more likely to be found through external benchmarking.
Most Appropriate for the Following Purposes- Several business units within the same organization exemplify good practice and management want to spread this expertise quickly, throughout the organization.
External Benchmarking
Involves analysing outside organisations that are known to be best in class. External benchmarking provides opportunities of learning from those who are at the "leading edge". This type of benchmarking can take up significant time and resource to ensure the comparability of data and information, the credibility of the findings and the development of sound recommendations.
Most Appropriate for the Following Purposes- Where examples of good practices can be found in other organisations and there is a lack of good practices within internal business units
International Benchmarking
Best practitioners are identified and analysed elsewhere in the world, perhaps because there are too few benchmarking partners within the same country to produce valid results. Globalization and advances in information technology are increasing opportunities for international projects. However, these can take more time and resources to set up and implement and the results may need careful analysis due to national differences.
Most Appropriate for the Following Purposes- Where the aim is to achieve world class status or simply because there are insufficient” national" businesses against which to benchmark.

No comments:

Post a Comment